A short audio clip of a computer-generated voice has become the most divisive subject on the internet since the gold/blue dress controversy of 2015.
The audio “illusion”, which first appeared on Reddit, seems to be saying one word – but whether that word is “Yanny” or “Laurel” is the source of furious disagreement.
Professor David Alais from the University of Sydney’s school of psychology says the Yanny/Laurel sound is an example of a “perceptually ambiguous stimulus” such as the Necker cube or the face/vase illusion.
“They can be seen in two ways, and often the mind flips back and forth between the two interpretations. This happens because the brain can’t decide on a definitive interpretation,” Alais says.
“If there is little ambiguity, the brain locks on to a single perceptual interpretation. Here, the Yanny/Laurel sound is meant to be ambiguous because each sound has a similar timing and energy content – so in principle it’s confusable.
“All of this goes to highlight just how much the brain is an active interpreter of sensory input, and thus that the external world is less objective than we like to believe.”
Alais says that for him, and presumably many others, it’s “100% Yanny” without any ambiguity.
That lack of ambiguity he says is probably down to two reasons: firstly his age. At 52 his ears lack high frequency sensitivity, a natural result of ageing; and secondly, a difference in pronunciation between the North American accented computer-generated “Yanny” and “Laurel” and how the words would naturally be spoken in Australian or British English.
This argument is further supported by the assistant professor of audition and cognitive neuroscience Lars Riecke at Maastricht University. Speaking to the Verge, Riecke suggests the “secret is frequency … but some of it is also the mechanics of your ears, and what you’re expecting to hear”.
“Most sounds – including L and Y, which are among the ones at issue here – are made up of several frequencies at once ... frequencies of the Y might have been made artificially higher, and the frequencies that make the L sound might have been dropped.”
Prof Hugh McDermott from Melbourne’s Bionics Institute suggests that while the frequency of the device you are listening on does have an impact, there are “a lot of different factors playing into it”.
“When the brain is uncertain of something, it uses surrounding cues to help you make the right decision,” he said.
“If you heard a conversation happening around you regarding ‘Laurel’ you wouldn’t have heard ‘Yanny’.
“Personal history can also give an unconscious preference for one or another. You could know many people named ‘Laurel’ and none called ‘Yanny’.”
McDermott also thinks visual cues may have played a part. “You would have noticed it had both the names appearing on the screen with no other context or information. This forces the brain to make a choice between those two alternatives.
“It is a compelling illusion and you can hear both those sounds either way.”
In National Geographic, Brad Story from the University of Arizona’s speech acoustics and physiology lab, claimed the original recording was “Laurel” but because the audio clip isn’t clear it leaves room for confusion and varying interpretations.
Story has experimented by recording his own voice pronouncing both words and found similar sound patterns for “Yanny” and “Laurel”.
Online commentators have added their own theories as to why people are hearing different words in the clip – and pointed out it varies depending on the level of frequency, amplitude and the type of speakers used to play back the clip.
According to the Twitter user Earth Vessel Quotes, the amount of bass projected from the sound device can have a significant impact.
Lower frequencies increase your chances of hearing the world “Laurel” while higher ones are more likely to sound like “Yanny”.
One user wrote on Reddit: “If you turn the volume very low, there will be practically no bass and you will hear Yanny. Turn the volume up and play it on some speakers that have actual bass response (AKA not your phone) and you will hear Laurel.”
A video posted by another Twitter user, Alex Saad, backs this theory by showing the sound mix morphing from “Yanny” into “Laurel” while toggling through different frequencies.
Others have speculated that the difference may be down to the age of the listener, or individual physiology. As you get older, your hearing range begins to deteriorate, making certain high frequencies hard or impossible to hear. This process can begin from the age of 25.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. Unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but our independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information. Thomasine, Sweden
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
View all comments >
comments (1383)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
I got Laurel but I could Hardy hear it.
For me it's the opposite. I hear laurel at the default, but in the down pitched links in this article I hear yanny, the up pitched ones also sound like laurel.
I'm not convinced this isn't a joke.
I’m getting ‘Kill them’, ‘Kill them’, ‘Kill them’...
Laurel.....after 100 listenings. But then English is not my m. tongue. and I'm in my 40s.
I'm in my fifties and english is my mother tongue and I 100% agree with you. Laurel.
I tried hard to hear Yanny, just to understand the other point of view, but I can't do it after several attempts.
100 listenings? Really
I made 4 seconds and decided it was bollox
For me it's the opposite. I hear laurel at the default, but in the down pitched links in this article I hear yanny, the up pitched ones also sound like laurel.
I'm not convinced this isn't a joke.
Well I hear laurel for all but very low pitched and that’s yearly!
Exactly - if your speakers amplify the bass you hear laurel which is at lower frequencies. If you pitch down the whole thing you will hear Yanny as those sounds enter the lower register.
I'm not sure this isn't a piss-take. The dress-colour thing wasn't any illusion either, just shitty colour balance in some images. It's all silly-season guff really.
Yanny. To me this sounds not even remotely like "Laurel" . I am 50.
Yanny for me as well! (I'm in my 50s.)
Yanny for me in all of them, except for the highest three pronunciations in the very last test when it suddenly became Laurel, before dropping back to Yanny. I'm 49.
50s, laurel ... not a trace of yanny. maybe because it's NOT A WORD :)
Yeamy! I hear all the time.
I get Yeahwy...
Yanny here too. I even tried to make out laurel but can't believe it can be confused!
me too
I’m 60. It’s absolutely Laurel.
I just hear someone who has been on 50 cigarettes a day slurring the word ''yarry' in a voice I don't want to hear again.
It’s definitely tarry
I'm over 21 and there's no way I can hear "yanny" even when I try its "Laurel". I cant believe a hoaxer could persuade this number of people to pretend to hear "yanny" though?
The Melbourne Shock Jock spent 40 minutes on this topic this morning. Talkback and all.
Our media is absolutely stuffed.
But the tension was palpable when he had to announce the courts decision on what he happily calls "union thugs".
He didn't ask any of those callers who their favourite football team was so credit where it's due.
What Yanni? It's "Hailey" - like the oboist from MITJ.
Yeah, Laura.
Sounds like "Yarry" to me and nothing like Yanny or Laurel. Does that mean I'm glitching?
I'm similar. It sound like Larry to me.
Surely you are in a different set of mind because I can´t hear an r. Never mind, It´s a lot of FUN...
Yep the exact same for me. Either way i'm already bored. Ciao
A good view of the landscape. A bunch of idiots being "cool" for not to say "divine". Stupidity at its top.
next time with a cogent series of words in an order that makes sense, please
Don't be harsh, PriscillaX! I thought it was a pretty cool haiku.
That the brain actively makes sense of sounds is no surprise to anyone that has taught themselves a foreign language. My favourite Black Adder episode when growing up was the one with the Spanish Infanta. I watched it dozens of times hearing just “noise” when the Infanta spoke. Recently I showed it to my daughter (having learnt Spanish as an adult) and was surprised to find that it had turned into an understandable language. It was still brilliant, although not sure it could be made today.
I hear Lonnie or Yarrell.
Sounds like "yeah me" to me, but spoken by a frog on helium.
Oh yeah, and an anthropomorphized one that somehow learned to speak English too, I bet he even wears little trousers and eats at Wagamama, when he's not shopping at Burberry and going to all the trendy nightspots in Wolverhampton.
Sound illusions happen. When I wacth a movie in english in Spain and then I go out to the street sometimes the voices in the back far away sound to me like english.
Thats because some of the people in the far away background ARE english. Duh.
I get this when I return to England from France. (I speak English and almost no French). For a couple of days afterwards, out-of-earshot speaking in English, eg background tv/radio, sounds to me like it's in French. Despite not really speaking French (or maybe because of that?) Weird- at least I'm not alone!
I was in Spain and, although I speak a bit, I'm not really attuned. I heard a spanish person say what sounded like "Journeyman" and thought I was losing the plot. I mean, what a strange word. Apparently he DID say journeyman, he was talking about the album!
Worst thing is when you have someone on TV selling you something that is not. Like recorded TV when it really is live. Isn´t it disorientating? Same thing happens in the radio. What they are after? Money.
Yellie. Definitely Yellie.
Tried it again and it's definitely Laurel. Truly strange.
As the spider said to Robert Bruce (well, ... inspired him): try a third time. Then you may hear "Hardy".
i hear alex the seal...
Neslon the Panda.
Neither of the claimed options.
To me it was "Yuh-Yorrel"
It's clearly "Laurel"....
I hear 'bollox' 'bollox'
Im so glad the comments are open on this controversial story.
It is rather instructive.
People often hear the same things differently, see colours differently and, more importantly, remember things differently; which makes witness testimony at
trials in law courts and other tribunals quite unreliable.
Whoosh
(Did that sound like “whoosh” or “are you serious”?)
RollyW is well aware he is replying to a sarcastic comment.
I hear Yanni. Sets me up for the day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aqbet0VLuW0
Thanks for the link, whataluckyman. I enjoyed a sample and bookmarked it! ( BTW, I hear Yanny).
It's definitely Laurel. What are you, deaf or mad? Or both?
It depends on the speakers/headphones you’re using, and partially on your ears.
Either that age explanation is rubbish or I dont need to worry about my hearing. I am Team Laurel
Just like me - so you possibly do need to visit an audiologist ;)
I AM an Audiologist, and it Laurel!
"Physician, heal thyself." ;)
Sounds like (see that?) it's a question of frequency.
I'm no audio engineer type expert, but I imagine that the virtually infinite configurations of devices, speakers, headphones, earphones, amplifiers, electronic audio processors and the listening environment — ambient sounds, furnishings, angles and dampening qualities of walls etc etc etc — under which people will listen to that thing, all affect the frequency.
This thing about older people not hearing the higher frequencies, and therefore tending to hear "Laurel", I suspect has more to do with the likelihood the geriatrics are listening on higher end devices with better, more accurate sound quality. Whereas the impoverished young punks, as they flit about town without any purpose or meaning in their lives, are probably listening on cheap tinny earphones connected to crap audio quality phones producing a higher frequency sound.
To prove the point everyone is required to reply to this post listing, in the greatest possible detail;
1) the equipment upon which they listen
2) the environment in which they listen
3) whether they hear Yanny or Laurel, and
4) into which of 'older' or 'younger' age group they fall
You are all encouraged to be as rambling as you like in your responses and feel free to include links and poetry and parables and political commentary etc.
I’ve listened on a PC through headphones (mediocre) and on an iPad through its internal speakers and through headphones (reasonably good). I’m mid 40s.
Laurel every time.
I can hear Yanny on the 20% and 30% downshifts. All the other pitch shifts are Laurel.
On the orignal, 100% Laurel. On the pitch shifted up 30% I get Yianni. Over 50 though - so probably technically deaf to anything over about 8KHz.
I'm deaf to frequencies above 1200 Hz.
Consequently I frquently mishear words which contain sibilants or which have clicks like the letter 'T'.
Like you, I heard mainly 'Yanni" at the higher frequencies but heard 'Laurel' quite distinctly at the original and lower pitches.
PS I also frequently mis-type words - which I do not believe can be attributed to industrial deafness ;)
I only hear Yanny on the pitch shifted downwards (the very bottom one).
Sign in or create your Guardian account to recommend a comment